Less is More: The Case Against Feature-Bloated CMS

After spending over a decade working with enterprise Content Management Systems, I’ve witnessed the evolution of web development and content management. While the common wisdom suggested that more features meant better content management, the landscape has dramatically shifted. Today, I challenge this assumption and explore why simpler solutions might be better for most applications.

Why We Needed Complex CMS

In the past, several factors drove the adoption of feature-rich Content Management Systems:

• Deployment Complexity: Deployments were time-consuming and complex, making it crucial to have systems that could manage changes efficiently.
• Limited Preview Environments: Testing content changes in realistic environments was challenging and resource-intensive.
• Client-Server Separation: The clear division between client and server-side logic often required multiple teams specializing in different areas working in coordination.
• Content Author Empowerment: Non-technical content authors needed ways to create and modify content without writing code and “deploy” changes quickly.

These challenges led to the development of CMS systems that emphasized reusable components, where developers could create web fragments that content authors could mix and match across various pages.

The Shifting Landscape

Several technological and cultural shifts are challenging the need for complex CMS solutions:

1. The Rise of AI-Assisted Content Creation

• Content authors can now leverage AI tools to write technical scripts, even if they do, we have specialized Prompt Engineering (Gen AI) tools to help them.
• The gap between technical and non-technical users is narrowing and will continue to narrow.

2. Evolution of Development Tools

The development landscape has dramatically changed:

• Modern metaframeworks enable rapid development and deployment.
• Smaller teams can now build and deploy solutions within a day.
• Disposable preview environments make testing and iteration more accessible

The Argument against Feature Rich CMS’

Enterprise CMS systems often introduce:

• Additional coding patterns that slow development.
• Complex abstraction layers making debugging challenging.
• Steep learning curves with each added feature.

The Overfitting Problem in CMS

In “Algorithms To Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions,” authors Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths discuss the concept of “overfitting” - a common machine learning problem where a model learns the training data too well, including its noise and outliers.

This concept provides a perfect analogy for the current state of web application feature complexity. When we introduce multiple layers of complexity to our web applications, we risk “overfitting” to edge cases and feature requests while losing sight of our primary goal: delivering value to the web user.

• Features that look impressive in demos but rarely provide value in practice.
• Complex personalization options that go unused or provide minimal ROI.
• Sophisticated A/B testing capabilities that most sites never fully utilize or are not worth the overhead.

While these features might be crucial for high-traffic, data-driven websites, they often become unnecessary overhead for most enterprise websites.

The Case for Simplicity

The future of web development might have more to do with the right features that truly serve the web user’s needs.

Benefits of Minimalist Approaches

1. Faster Development Cycles: Less complexity means quicker implementation
2. Easier Maintenance: Simpler systems are easier to debug and update
3. Better Performance: Fewer features often translate to better site performance
4. Lower Learning Curve: New team members can become productive more quickly

Modern Alternatives

The web development landscape now offers simpler, more focused solutions:

• Metaframeworks like Astro: Offering performance and simplicity without sacrificing functionality
• Content management systems like TinaCMS: Providing Git-based, Markdown-centric approaches
• Modern serverless infrastructure: Services like Cloudflare’s R2 (object storage), KV (key-value store), and D1 (SQL database) enable powerful functionality without complex infrastructure

Real-World Example: A Personal Journey

My recent exploration of bespoke applications and frameworks like Astro has made me realize the beauty of simplicity. The ability to write content in Markdown, leverage AI for enhancement, and deploy changes within hours demonstrates how modern tools can replace complex CMS features.

For instance, this very article was written in Markdown with the help of AI tools and will be deployed within hours. While this might seem trivial, it represents a significant shift from the traditional CMS workflow that would have involved multiple steps, systems, and potentially teams.

Conclusion

While enterprise CMS platforms still have their place, especially in large organizations with complex content management and personalization needs, we should critically evaluate whether their complexity adds value to our specific use cases. The future of web development might not be about having more features, but about having the right features that truly adds value to the web user.

References:

1. Algorithms To Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions,” authors Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths
2. Overfitting - AWS
3. Overfitting, An aticle by Ken Hoffman on Medium